Property prices cannot keep rising at the same rate

By:

A common question people ask is, “can property prices continue to rise at the same rate which they have over the past 3 to 4 decades?”

House PriceThe short answer is no, they cannot.

Mathematically, this is unlikely to occur as incomes are not rising at the same pace.

I came across the interesting graphic/visualisation (below) which sets out how property values have changed in real terms (excluding inflation) since 1970.

The surprise for me was how much Canberra prices have risen (thanks, public servants and politicians!) and how attractive Brisbane prices appear.

What has driven property prices over the past 3 to 4 decades?

In order to form a view with respect to future property price growth, it is important to understand what has driven property values over the past few decades.

There have been some events which are unlikely to be repeated.

Below are some of the key factors, in no particular order.

Population growth

Australia’s population has been growing at a faster rate than other developed countries, mainly due to higher levels of overseas immigration.

Population growth increases demand for housing, especially in capital cities as skilled migrants are attracted to job opportunities.

Increase in access to borrowings

Interest Only Lending AustraliaAustralians are borrowing 2 to 3 times more than they were in the 1970s.

Banking deregulation in the ’80s and ‘90s opened up more competition between lenders and reduced home loan margins i.e. mortgages became cheaper.

The tables were turned, and suddenly potential borrowers were being approached (marketed to) by the banks, not the other way around.

Increase in household income

In a family unit, it is a lot more common for both spouses to work compared to fifty years ago.

In fact, often it is necessary for both spouses to work in order to afford to live in their desired location.

The transition from one to two household incomes has extended property purchasing power.

People are buying their first home later in life

In my experience, most first home buyers are in their late twenties to early thirties.

First Home BuyersThis is partly because homes are relatively unaffordable for younger people in their early twenties.

But also, younger people tend to prefer to focus on their career thereby maximising their income earning capacity before they buy a home and/or have children.

This puts them in a relatively stronger financial position compared to first home buyers 50 years ago.

Access to more information

The internet has opened up a wealth of information. People are able to educate themselves about how to build wealth with property, including the advantages of borrowing to invest. This blog is an example of this. I write over 50,000 words a year, sharing almost 20 years of experience, which people can read for free. Such information was non-existent before the 2000s.

More, bigger, better

Drive around a newly developed residential suburb and you will notice that the homes are massive.

More bedrooms, bigger living areas and smaller back yards.

New home buyers are building larger homes with improved amenities and finishes compared to a few decades ago.

These improvements contribute towards the increase in the value of property.

The same is true when people renovate existing properties in established locations.

All of the above factors have contributed significantly to property price growth over the past 3 to 4 decades.

Which of these will reoccur over the next 20 plus years?

Some of the above factors will persist, some won’t, and some might impede future growth.

Here are the factors that I think will influence property price growth over the next few decades.

Population growth will be equal or higher

Of course, the negative health and economic impacts caused by Covid have been devastating, and I don’t seek to diminish that.

However, from a global perspective, Australia’s handling of the virus will be looked upon very favourably.

PopulationWhilst New Zealand has also done well, Australia offers more job opportunities.

As such, I think Australia’s handling of the virus will be the biggest contributor to an increase in demand for immigration in the future.

Assuming the government’s immigration policy remains unchanged, our population growth rate is likely to be the same or higher over the coming decades.

This will be a positive contributor to property demand.

Borrowing capacity will not increase

Banks are willing to lend borrowers approximately two to three times more compared to the 1980s. However, borrowing capacity has reduced over recent years.

In summary, lending capacity rose significantly between early 1990s and 2007/8.

However, since the GFC, borrowing capacity has contracted. It is my view that borrowing capacity won’t change materially from hereon in.

Therefore, the event of large increases in borrowing capacity (i.e. loose lending standards) won’t be repeated again.

Incomes will also constrain borrowing capacity

It is unlikely that incomes will rise at a rate greater than inflation, at least not in the foreseeable future anyway.

Wooden Puzzles With The Image Of Money IncomeThat means, in real terms, incomes will either be flat or falling.

In addition, in my experience, families with young children are already working as much as they can, so there’s limited ability to increase their income further.

As such, the income uplift created by both spouses seeking work (compared to just one), won’t be repeated. [As a side note, the cost of childcare is a real problem. People often balk at the cost of private school fees, but childcare can sometimes cost more.]

Overall, at a macro level, supply of new lending and incomes will not have the same positive impact on property growth as they did previously.

Congestion will get worse

Most economists and demographers would agree that Australia has under-invested in infrastructure including roads and public transport.

As such, our capital cities are becoming more congested.

This trend is unlikely to ease anytime soon.

PopulationAs such, living closer to the CBD becomes even more attractive.

Yes, working from home will be a permanent trend.

But I believe that most people will opt for a hybrid model consisting of a few days in the office and a few at home.

More importantly, there are other attractions to living in a city including proximity to family and friends, schools and recreational/entertainment opportunities.

These factors will likely include demand for, and therefore prices of, property price growth located in inner-ring, blue-chip locations.

Economic inequality will get worse

Sadly, the gap between rich and poor gets wider each year.

Unfortunately, Covid will exacerbate this as the lockdowns have clearly impacted lower income earners (whereas data shows the top 40% of income earners have not been impacted at all).

If this trend continues (and it almost certainly will) there will be a significant cohort of high-income earners that will be willing and able to pay more for property in sort after locations.

As such, the value gap between blue-chip locations and outer suburbs will widen.

We may not be able to rely upon a rising tide

As the saying goes, in a rising tide, all ships rise.

Since the early 1980s, the property market has benefited from a rising tide (for the reasons discussed above).

MarketYou could have bought a property in the early 80’s in any capital city in Australia and it would have made you a lot of money.

But the tide may not continue to rise.

Population growth is probably the only factor that will universally contribute to positive property value appreciation.

However, apart from that, the factors that have helped middle-to-lower income earners increase their purchasing power over the past few decades, probably won’t repeat themselves.

Not all property will rise in value perpetually

This means the type and location of the property you invest in will matter a lot more over the next few decades than it did over the previous few decades.

It is best to adopt the investment assumption that the ‘rising tide’ will not continue.

Therefore, asset selection is critical to get right.

Even if this assumption turns out to be incorrect, you’ll achieve better than average returns.

icon-podcast-large

Subscribe & don’t miss a single episode of Michael Yardney’s podcast

Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.

Need help listening to Michael Yardney’s podcast from your phone or tablet?

We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.

icon-email-large

Prefer to subscribe via email?

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.


About

Stuart was a Chartered Accountant before establishing mortgage broking firm ProSolution Private Clients. He has authored two books and shares his experience with readers of Property Update. Visit www.prosolution.com.au


'Property prices cannot keep rising at the same rate' have 3 comments

    Avatar for Stuart Wemyss

    February 6, 2021 fred smith

    appreciate your analysis but enough with the digs against public servants and politicians. Try living in a country with a dysfunctional public sector and you’ll know how critical the public service is to the running of a country and the economy you make money from. Aus COVID response, and educated population, reliable land tenure etc are all the product of government. And as you acknowledge, more infrastructure is needed – its a public good the private sector went spend on.

    Reply

    Avatar for Stuart Wemyss

    February 6, 2021 NATHAN JONES

    Agree with all – except that the working from home revolution well and truly took off in 2020.
    Gone are the days of packed like sardines busses and trains.
    Coastal and country areas within ‘2 hour’ commute will be the next big growth area.
    1 or 2 day a week commute is what the hybrid model is moving towards – not a 3 or 4 day commute.
    Regional areas will get better government investment with growing populations and some ‘out hicksville’ regional and coastal towns will “gentrify” (like inner city areas did in 70’s to 90’s) with higher earning workers and cashed up retirees moving there in droves. (probably pricing out the long term locals to long term renters or move away sadly). In turn the local schools will have more kids – and kids of parents who are ‘highly qualified’ – so regional schools will get bigger and better and Naplan and Y12 test results will catch up to inner city schools.
    The Gap between rich state capital cities house prices and ‘poor’ regional areas will shrink by the year to almost nothing. In places like SE QLD – Brisbane is cheaper than both the Sunny and Gold Coasts.
    Literally dozens of examples in every direction of each capital city around Australia. One e.g is the Tweed – high growth, an hour from Brisbane CBD (with no traffic). Even closer to booming Gold Coast. The Tweed Valley has a new $700 million hospital about a year or so from being fully complete.
    Also – No one wants to live in a tiny studio during a pandemic and month long lonely lockdowns- but people have to live somewhere. The new outer regional commuters who may only travel into the city a few days a week may buy up the out of flavour apartments they only have to live in a few nights a week. Just depends on the family wealth – some may have a big property an hour or two from the city AND a spacious 2 or 3 bed unit close to the city office.
    No one has a crystal ball. I could be wrong and any prediction could be wrong.

    Reply


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.
CAPTCHA Image

*


Copyright © Michael Yardney’s Property Investment Update Important Information
Content Marketing by GridConcepts