Australia’s bank regulator APRA has found a significant tightening of home lending criteria since it began a crackdown in late 2014.
The Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority recently said that banks have become stricter when assessing borrowers’ capacity to repay loans after it clamped down on them last year, but they need to improve standards even further to safeguard the financial system.
Banks lending practices were loose and there was a culture of “not being able to assess good borrowers from bad ones” which led to banks not being able to tell “the wood from the trees.”
However the measures taken by the regulator to tighten up bank lending practices has resulted in an increasingly strong financial system which is now resilient towards housing shocks, general manager industry analysis Heidi Richards said at the Macquarie University Financial Risk Day forum in Sydney.
“A few years ago we were concerned about the exuberance in the housing market, and we wrote to the banks in 2011.
What we saw is the constant focus on short term profits … it is easy to justify a slight loosening of standards especially in the face of competition. Banks think … as long as we are in the pack, we will be fine.”
LVRs are falling
And serviceability criteria were sometimes loose with some banks taking into account non-wages and salary income sources such as bonuses and many banks were factoring in the negative gear financial benefits in order to assess loan applications.
Since APRA intervened banks have become stricter when assessing borrowers’ capacity to repay loans.
APRA now believes “debt serviceability assessments now appear to be both more prudent and more consistent” across the banking sector compared to December 2014, when it wrote to banks warning them to tighten their lending standards.
Several banks are also applying larger discounts to less stable sources of income, such as overtime, bonuses, commissions, investment dividends and rental income when assessing borrower income, APRA said, and are now scaling their assumptions about living expenses in line with income.
Investors can borrow less.
Tighter criteria mean that more marginal borrowers are increasingly likely to have their loan applications rejected, while those who do get finance will generally find they are offered a smaller maximum loan size.
A fresh survey into the treatment of four hypothetical borrowers shows that the average maximum amount that an owner-occupier could borrow fell by 6 per cent.
With APRA particularly concerned about the previously rapid growth in investor home loans, and introducing a speed limit on growth in that area, the maximum average loan to investors dropped 12 per cent.
Subscribe & don’t miss a single episode of Michael Yardney’s podcast
Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.
Need help listening to Michael Yardney’s podcast from your phone or tablet?
We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.
Prefer to subscribe via email?
Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.