Is there really a housing affordability crisis?
Now I’m not arguing that it’s hard to get into the housing market – it is, but maybe it’s no harder than before. 
According to the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA), those arguing property’s lack of affordability haven’t studied the numbers properly.
In fact their research suggests that mortgages are more affordable now than they were in 1990…
“Many commentators use just two indicators to measure housing affordability – income and house prices,” PIPA Chairman Peter Koulizos said.
“This is a good measure to indicate how expensive housing is, but if you want to analyse affordability, you must also consider mortgage repayments.”
PIPA examined annual figures looking at the average size of a home loan, the standard variable rate, principal and interest loan repayments and the annual average wage from 1990 to today.
| YEAR | AVERAGE LOAN SIZE | STANDARD VARIABLE RATE | ANNUAL P & I LOAN REPAYMENTS | AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGES | % OF ANNUAL SALARY |
| 1990 | $66,300 | 17.0% | $11,340 | $23,600 | 48.1% |
| 1995 | $90,900 | 10.5% | $9,972 | $28,236 | 35.3% |
| 2000 | $139,700 | 6.8% | $10,932 | $31,928 | 34.2% |
| 2005 | $210,800 | 7.1% | $17,004 | $39,728 | 42.8% |
| 2010 | $300,200 | 5.6% | $20,676 | $49,712 | 41.6% |
| 2011 | $304,200 | 7.4% | $25,272 | $51,896 | 48.7% |
| 2012 | $296,100 | 7.8% | $25,584 | $53,820 | 47.5% |
| 2013 | $305,200 | 6.6% | $23,388 | $56,212 | 41.6% |
| 2014 | $316,900 | 5.5% | $21,588 | $57,928 | 37.3% |
| 2015 | $332,900 | 5.5% | $22,680 | $58,708 | 38.6% |
| 2016 | $365,500 | 5.4% | $24,624 | $59,592 | 41.3% |
| 2017 | $363,300 | 5.1% | $23,676 | $60,528 | 39.1% |
| 2018 | $389,000 | 5.1% | $25,344 | $61,984 | 40.9% |
Sources: ABS, www.tradingeconomics.com, loansense.com.au, NAB
“The key figure to look at is the last column – the percentage of an average person’s income needed to make the mortgage repayments,” Mr Koulizos said.
Mr Koulizos said, based on this realistic analysis, home loans are as affordable now as they were in 2010, and actually more affordable than 28 years ago.
“In 2018 figures, you need 40.9 per cent of the average annual salary to pay the mortgage,” he said.
“Compared to 1990 when you needed 48.1 per cent of the average annual salary, property owners are in a better position.”
He said interest rates played a major role in driving affordability, and our current low rate environment was keeping property price-accessible.
Mr Koulizos said in 1990, when home loan interest rates were 17 per cent, it required 48.1 per cent of the average person’s salary to make the mortgage repayments.
Five years later, you only needed 35.3 per cent of the average salary to make the mortgage repayments.
“Why such an improvement in affordability in such a short period of time? It’s due mainly to markedly lower interest rates in 1995 as compared to 1990.”
Mr Koulizos said rather than the ability to service a loan, it was the initial deposit that seems to stump most potential first buyers.
“There little doubt it can be tough saving for a deposit, although many first timers are using innovative strategies such as rentvesting and buying in more affordable locations as well as buying with family and friends to get a foot on the real estate ladder.”
Mr Koulizos suggests buyers need to ensure they are relying on expert advice from a qualified property investment professional as well as seeking the best possible finance deal.
“Shop around and use a reputable mortgage broker and professional property investment advisor,” he said.
SUBSCRIBE & DON'T MISS A SINGLE EPISODE OF MICHAEL YARDNEY'S PODCAST
Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.
PREFER TO SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL?
Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.
'This is why housing is more affordable now than in 1990' have 4 comments
May 20, 2018 @ 3:32 pm Graham Revill
Taxation is another factor often confuses any long term comparisons.
It might be more relevant to compare median house prices to median after tax family earnings. Its probably not a number that is available.
May 20, 2018 @ 3:54 pm Michael Yardney
Graham – you make a good point – affordability is related to your disposable income – not your earned income
May 18, 2018 @ 9:45 am Chris
A good comparison of years and affordability, but average income though only tells part of the story. We live in a society with much higher levels of underemployment and insecure income due to contract and casualised labour. That also plays into the perception of affordability and associated risks for buyers.
There is therefore a greater disparity between high and low income earners. So, I think that a better measure (or at least an interesting comparison) would be the use median income to reflect the predominant income range today. I suspect that might tell a different story. Blunt statistics rarely capture what is really being experienced at a more micro level.
May 18, 2018 @ 4:41 pm Michael Yardney
You’re right Chris – there’s lots of ways of looking at this