Please use the menu below to navigate to any article section:
Have you ever wondered what Australia will look like 30 years from now?
Chances are you won’t recognise it as our population is likely to grow by 50%.
Australia’s largest cities are facing a watershed moment in their growth and development.
According to Infrastructure Australia in the coming 30 years Australia’s population is forecast to increase by 11.8 million people.
Putting this into perspective…
That’s equivalent to adding a new city, roughly the size of Canberra, each year for the next 30 years.
And about 75% of this growth will occur in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.
By 2046, Sydney will be home to 7.4 million people with Melbourne trailing just slightly on 7.3 million.
Perth will boast 4.3 million residents, and Brisbane will grow to accommodate four million.
Clearly this significant growth will create some amazing opportunities, but also many social and infrastructure problems.
Infrastructure Australia explains:
“Asia’s global middle class as well as our own rapidly growing population will unlock new economic frontiers for Australia, but we need to position our cities to take advantage of this historic opportunity.”
What I think they are saying is that Asia’s growing middle class are not only providing Australia with export opportunities but they are also the source of a large proportion of the young skilled migrants driving Australia’s population growth, while meeting our labor force and skills needs.
Is it time to slow down?
Recently former prime minister Tony Abbott reignited debate by suggesting the federal government should reduce immigration levels from 190,000 to 110,000 people a year.
Abbott suggesting that cutting immigration would address “stagnant wages, unaffordable housing and clogged infrastructure.”
Australia’s population growth rate is around 1.6 per cent a year, or 390,000 people.
Half of this growth is from immigration.
Treasurer Scott Morrison responded saying that Abbott’s proposal would cost the federal budget up to $5 billion because “basically the economy [would not be] growing at the same level and people who come as skilled migrants pay taxes, make a net contribution to the economy”.
Now is not the time to “wave the white flag on population growth or dredge up dogmatic slogans that our cities are full,” says the Property Council’s chief executive Ken Morrison.
“We must accept that we are on an unavoidable growth trajectory, and to recognise that our future prosperity is linked to the performance of our cities.”
So…what will our cities look like?
I’ve recently explained why the Melbourne and Sydney property markets have decoupled from the rest of Australia.
Infrastructure Australia is firmly in favour of population growth, which it argues is a “powerful source of economic dynamism”.
The report states that planning for higher density employment centres is…
“crucial for the economic performance of our cities. This is because it facilitates their key competitive advantage – access to economic opportunities…”
In other words, well-planned higher density places to work and live are necessary to meet the needs of the new economy because they facilitate the generation and implementation of ideas.
But failing to effectively anticipate and respond to growth, is likely to mean “declining economic productivity, increasing environmental pressures and a marked reduction in each city’s quality of life”.
Scenario analysis undertaken by Infrastructure Australia finds that “unplanned growth” delivers the “worst outcomes” for our fastest-growing cities.
While no one really knows what the future holds, Infrastructure Australia has developed six hypothetical growth scenarios, three each for Melbourne and Sydney in the year 2046.
The scenarios seek to test commonly posed questions about how Australian cities could grow and change, including:
- Should our cities expand outwards, at a low density, or consolidate inwards at a higher density?
- Should we seek to locate jobs in a small number of large centres or distribute them more evenly across the metropolitan area?
- What mix of modes and network structure is best suited to meet the needs of a larger city?
The scenarios assume common population and employment growth totals within consistent metropolitan boundaries, but differ by the location of this growth, and by the future structure of the transport network.
Below are the graphic representations of what our 2 big super star cities could look like.
Whatever the case, our population growth, which is growing faster than any other developed nation, plus the wealth of our nation, will underpin our capital city property markets moving forward.
Subscribe & don’t miss a single episode of Michael Yardney’s podcast
Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.
Need help listening to Michael Yardney’s podcast from your phone or tablet?
We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.
Prefer to subscribe via email?
Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.