Australia is an entrepreneurial country of more than two million small businesses.
Perhaps it’s our “give it a go” attitude that sees so many of us decide to take control of our financial futures.
Of course, without small businesses, our economy wouldn’t exist given some 97 per cent of all businesses are classified as ones that employ fewer than 19 staff.
You could be employed in a small business or you’re a small business owner yourself.
The thing is, like with any commercial venture, there are some complexities that arise when you strike out on your own.
One of the main ones is when it comes to asset protection, especially if your business is an industry that has litigation potential.
Owning a home in a trust
I recently helped a client, Greg, who owned a successful construction business.
While lawyers had never darkened his door, he was still concerned about protecting his assets if one day they unfortunately did.
His main problem was that he didn’t know how to protect his future family home from the litigation without losing the main residence concession for Capital Gains Tax.
You see, owning property in a trust for asset protection purposes will usually mean that you lose its tax-free capital gains status as well as creating land tax implications.
Greg intended to renovate the property, given his building skills, and live there for five or more years.
Given the upgrade that would be completed over that time period, he forecast a capital gain of up to $1 million but was clearly not keen on handing over $200,000 of his sweat equity to the tax department.
Given his desire to protect the family home from litigation, buying it in either his or his spouse’s name was not advisable.
However, there is a way to own family property in a trust without kissing goodbye to taxation benefits.
- Also read:Exploring the link between population growth and property prices
- Also read:Australian unit market update June 2022
- Also read:Here is what we have been buying over the last 12 months
- Also read:EXPLAINER: New home buyer scheme helps frontline workers get into the property market
- Also read:Number of profitable property resales takes first dip in 18 months | Corelogic Pain and Gain Report
Professional property taxation advisors understand the legislation inside and out, which is why I knew of a solution.
So, the first thing we did was to develop a strategy to protect the property if successfully litigated.
This strategy utilised a specifically worded trust with additional documentation to support Greg’s requirements.
Of course, without professional assistance, there is no way that Greg would have known that this strategy existed.
Then again, I wouldn’t know how to build a house either because I am not a professional in that industry.
And that’s why I would use the services of someone like Greg to construct a property – otherwise, it would probably look like something a two-year-old made from Lego!
I digress, but I’m sure you get my point, which is that using a Main Residence Trust enabled Greg to receive the full benefit of a tax-free future sale of his family home.
He also would not be liable for land tax given the property was classified as his main residence for taxation purposes, while also being in a protected trust environment.
When Greg came to see me, he was sure there was not much that could be done about his situation because most of the information he found online said so.
However, by seeking professional advice from people who specialise and have a multi-disciplined approach of what you are trying to achieve, we were able to create a successful outcome.
During our time together, we were also able to prepare a strategic plan that looked at a variety of issues – and not just one – because a detailed plan often uncovers more than what was initially expected.
In Greg’s case, we identified his agreement with his partner was not robust enough in the event of one partner’s death, plus the finance strategy he had adopted did not maximise his interest deductibility on investment debt.
So, it really was a win-win-win situation that ultimately protected his family home from litigation and potentially saved him hundreds of thousands of tax dollars.