What should buyers of a house be told about it?

It’s still mostly a case of ‘buyer beware’ when it comes to finding out about a property – but many buyers feel they should be told if, for example, it was the scene of a violent murder, writes…

Patricia Lane, University of Sydney

Buying a house is probably one of the most important purchases a person will make.  Truths About Property Investing

Many people think the vendor is required to disclose matters that affect the property value, particularly if the buyer has no other means of finding out the full history of the house.

For instance, if someone was murdered in the house, do the buyers have a right to be told?

The solicitor or conveyancer who acts for a buyer will probably tell them the law is “buyer beware”.

It is up to buyers to satisfy themselves that the property is not affected by any defects in title, that it can be used for the purposes the buyer intends, and that any building on the property is sound.

If a vendor actively conceals a known defect, then that might amount to fraud.

Examples include painting to conceal serious termite damage, or giving a deliberately false answer to a question from a buyer about the property.

A purchaser would need to show, though, that the vendor was deliberately dishonest or at least reckless.   

ad_build_wealth

That’s a high standard of proof to meet.

The law requires vendors in some states, including New South Wales and Victoria, to disclose the title documents and any registered encumbrances such as easements and covenants.

The vendor’s mortgages will be discharged on settlement.

In NSW and some other states, vendors must attach to the contract a certificate from the local council that sets out whether the land is affected by administrative or regulatory matters.

This includes issues like zoning, subdivision, contaminated land or identified bushfire or flood hazards.

These council certificates can give buyers a good idea of whether they will be able to use the property as they wish. suburb-area-map-location-street-city-road

Where certain statutory requirements have not been disclosed, the buyer can rescind the contract and get their deposit back if the matter was so important that they would not have entered into the contract had they known about it.

In many states, though, there is no duty to disclose matters relating to the title or the use of the land.

If the property is a commercial or investment property, the Australian Consumer Law gives remedies to buyers who are induced to enter into contracts by misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce by the vendor or the vendor’s agent.

Even if the vendor is selling privately, an agent might still be liable if they misrepresent the property, or tell half-truths that give a misleading impression.

But there is still no general duty on vendors or their agents to disclose matters that affect the property value and may be significant to buyers, but which do not amount to defects in title that can’t be discovered by reasonable inspection.

How far should disclosure go?

Should vendors be obliged to disclose all matters that might influence a buyer?

There is probably a good case for all state and territory governments to follow NSW with a requirement to disclose council information.

But, beyond that, just how far should a duty of disclosure go? Sydney map

For instance, if something terrible, such as murder or other violent and upsetting events, has happened at a property, should a vendor be required to tell potential buyers about this?

In some US states, courts have held that a vendor should disclose the history of the house where a murder has been committed.

US brokers call these “stigmatised properties”.

In a case in NSW, a house where three members of a family were murdered was sold to unsuspecting buyers, who later found out about this history.

They refused to proceed, but as the vendors were not required to disclose the history, the buyers lost their deposit.

The estate agent who handled the sale was ultimately fined for glossing over the history of the house.

The agent also met the cost of the forfeited deposit, but that depended on the particular facts involved. Choose Select Property Investor

Such horrible events are rare, but buyers might be very distressed by that kind of history.

Shouldn’t buyers have complete information?

One problem is just how far any duty of disclosure would reach.

Should any matter at all that affects the value of the property be disclosed?

Some buyers might be particularly sensitive and consider that they should be given comprehensive information about the history of the property.

Would it be necessary to disclose that a person had died at the property, even if of old age or natural causes?

Just as vendors might not know about any structural defects in the property, they might not know much about the history of the property.

A landlord vendor, for example, might not have information about what went on in the house while tenants were living in it.

It might be unfair, then, to shift to the vendor the risk of any decline in value caused by sensitive buyers. Property

Estate agents are usually responsible for marketing the property.

So, if any duty is to exist for making statements about it, perhaps this should lie on the agent, and not the vendors, and should be confined to compensation rather than the ability to get out of the sale.

Purchasers can always on-sell a bad bargain, but vendors might be stuck with the property through no fault of their own if they have to bear the responsibility of disclosing everything about its history.The Conversation

Patricia Lane, Senior Lecturer, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.



icon-podcast-large

SUBSCRIBE & DON'T MISS A SINGLE EPISODE OF MICHAEL YARDNEY'S PODCAST

Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.

 

NEED HELP LISTENING TO MICHAEL YARDNEY'S PODCAST FROM YOUR PHONE OR TABLET?

We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.

icon-email-large

PREFER TO SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL?

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.


Avatar for Property Update

About

Apart from our regular team of experts, we frequently publish commentary from guest contributors who are authorities in their field.


'What should buyers of a house be told about it?' have no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.
CAPTCHA Image

*

facebook
twitter
google
0
linkedin
0
email

Michael's Daily Insights

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers.

NOTE: this daily service is a different subscription to our weekly newsletter so...

REGISTER NOW

Subscribe!