Weekly economic update: booming jobs numbers, but dig deeper and it’s not all rosy

A big increase in employment but the unemployment is flat – addressing this will be a challenge as all our options have downsides, writes…

Richard Holden, UNSW


The latest labour market data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics provide an instructive lens into the problems facing the federal government, the RBA, and the economy itself.

The number of people employed rose 50,900 from May to June in seasonally adjusted terms, which was well ahead of forecasts of around 16,500.

And that wasn’t just a lot of new part-time jobs.  15101529_l

Full-time employment rose by 41,200.

On a year-on-year basis that represents an increase in employment of 2.8%.

No doubt Treasurer Scott Morrison will tout these figures as evidence of the government’s focus on “jobs and growth”.

Don’t get me wrong: it’s good that employment is going up.

But dig a little deeper and the story is not so rosy.

One might think that robust increases in the number of people employed reduce the unemployment rate a lot. Not so.

The number of people unemployed fell from 715,200 in May to 714,100 in June.

That, of course, is explained by the so-called participation rate – the proportion of people participating or trying to participate in the paid labour market. 

investor-needs-to-know-about-finance-tax-and-the-law

The participation rate rose from 65.5% in May to 65.7% in June, leaving the unemployment rate unchanged at 5.4%.

The Australian labour force participation rate is actually pretty high.

A useful comparison is the United States – probably the world’s most robust labour market – where the current rate is 62.9%.

The key point is that if more people are going to come into the labour market when it looks better – as they have been consistently – then a continued reduction in the unemployment rate is going to require creating a whole lot more jobs.

So when the prime minister and treasurer point out what a large number of jobs are being created – 400,000 in 2017 – they are both right and wrong.

Yes, 400,000 is a demonstrably large number. But it’s just not enough to get unemployment down.

What about wages?

What the data released Thursday did not reveal was anything about what people are paid.

Perhaps the most concerning thing about the Australian labour market is that wages are not growing at anywhere near historic-average levels and this has been going on for several years.

Private-sector wages grew over the last year by 1.9% – the same rate as consumer prices (inflation).  25961181_s-1

In other words, real wage growth is zero.

Unemployment that seems stuck at around 5.4% and real wages growth that is zero.

What to do?

The traditional approach would be for the RBA to cut interest rates – and some commentators still advocate this.

There are at least three problems with this approach, however.

First, with the official cash rate at 1.5% there is not a lot of wiggle room.

Although it is fair to point out that there is precisely 1.5% of wiggle room.

That bring us to problem two, which is that a further cut in interest rates is likely to fuel property prices and, perhaps more importantly, household debt.

The RBA has repeatedly shown concern about this, and with good reason.

Third, and this is more subtle, if the RBA does cut rates much further then they will have nowhere to go in the case of a major economic downturn. Reserve Bank Of Australia

That would force them to respond to a major downturn with unconventional measures such as quantitative easing.

Another approach would be for the government to run large deficits – also known as fiscal policy.

But here, too, there are significant problems.

We have been running pretty large deficits for some time, which has put our credit rating in jeopardy.

True, Australia’s net debt-to-GDP ratio of around 18.9% is low by international standards, but there seems little appetite on either side of politics to run that up further.

The final approach is to reform labour market institutions and make them more flexible – sometimes called “microeconomic reform”.

It is plausible that this would have a decent chance of lowering unemployment. globe-economy-growth-health-world-heart-decline-map

But it would also push Australia closer to a United States-style labour model.

The ConversationNone of these options are without real downsides.

And none of them seem likely to appeal to the voting public.

That’s why the unemployment rate in Australia is a particularly challenging problem.

Richard Holden, Professor of Economics and PLuS Alliance Fellow, UNSW

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.



icon-podcast-large

SUBSCRIBE & DON'T MISS A SINGLE EPISODE OF MICHAEL YARDNEY'S PODCAST

Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.

 

NEED HELP LISTENING TO MICHAEL YARDNEY'S PODCAST FROM YOUR PHONE OR TABLET?

We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.

icon-email-large

PREFER TO SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL?

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.


Avatar for Property Update

About

Apart from our regular team of experts, we frequently publish commentary from guest contributors who are authorities in their field.


'Weekly economic update: booming jobs numbers, but dig deeper and it’s not all rosy' have no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.
CAPTCHA Image

*

facebook
twitter
google
0
linkedin
0
email

Michael's Daily Insights

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers.

NOTE: this daily service is a different subscription to our weekly newsletter so...

REGISTER NOW

Subscribe!