It’s time to choose what kind of tax system we want

Reforming our tax system is in the news a lot lately.

Now it’s time to choose what kind of tax system we want.Reforming our tax system is in the news a lot lately

By Miranda Stewart, Australian National University

Five years ago the Henry Review undertook a detailed examination of Australia’s tax and transfer system.

This week the Tax and Transfer Policy Institute at ANU’s Crawford School has revisited the Henry Review, as the Australian government prepares to release its tax white paper.

Tax reform should not be piecemeal, but should be considered across the system as a whole.

Australia raises less tax overall than many comparable countries, including Canada and New Zealand.

Tax and Transfer Policy Institute

Tax as a percentage of GDP: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, OECD average
OECD Revenue Statistics 2014

There is scope, and likely the budgetary need, to increase Australia’s tax take.

As the Henry Review argued, reform should aim to strengthen tax across all bases – personal and business income, economic rents from resources and land, and private consumption.

The Henry Review reported just as the global financial crisis hit, and five years later economic prospects are weak and nominal growth – on which tax revenues depend – is at the lowest rate in 50 years.

Sustainable economic growth will require a significant kick to workforce participation, productivity and better allocation of investment capital.

What’s fair

It’s crucial that we promote fairness in an overall progressive tax-transfer system.

[sam id=50 codes=’true’]

We also need to support individuals to flourish in economic activity and work.

And we must build resilience of the system to economic, social and technological challenges.

There is widespread public concern about income and wealth inequality, in community studies and academic research.

Income inequality is rising in Australia even after the impact of taxes and transfers.

Personal income tax – still crucial

The progressive personal income tax is key to addressing inequality and is our biggest revenue raiser – as shown below.

If we want to lower effective marginal tax rates to deal with bracket creep and build workforce participation by women, low earners and mature workers, we will need to broaden the base.

Personal income tax - still crucial

Taxes levied by Commonwealth Government 2012-13
Commonwealth Treasury

As the Henry Review argued, a 40% savings income discount for net capital gains and net income from savings – after expenses are deducted – would reduce rental losses produced by negative gearing, be fairer and provide a more coherent approach to different kinds of savings, including bank accounts.

More than 70% of individuals use tax agents – a far higher percentage than most comparable countries – and only 20% file themselves electronically.

tax_return_360_18s4kr3-18s4ksiAn individual e-tax account is surely the way of the future, and if we reduce different treatment of expenses and investments and other planning margins, compliance will be easier.

Tax reform must build on the system we already have.

It is fairest to treat super contributions like other remuneration from work – taxed at marginal rates – with a tax credit for contributions of low to moderate income earners.

Earnings are concessionally taxed to encourage saving.

Keeping exempt payouts would provide transitional fairness for those who have been saving for the last decade or more.

We could tax capital gains on the home over a high threshold – and the same could be done for super payouts.

And we could tax capital gains on death as Canada does. But it’s important to learn from empirical studies, such as a recent study by the UK Revenue of a tax rate change, that such taxes will likely change behaviour and may not raise much revenue.

That could be a good thing, dampening excessive speculative investment in these assets.

The income tax exemption for the home should likely be retained – but we should be taxing those who have a home more comprehensively with a land tax – while removing duties, helping housing affordability.

Such a change is underway in the Australian Capital Territory and has been proposed in South Australia.

The company tax falls on people

Australia’s company tax collects significant revenue, ensures that foreign investors pay some tax and collects on economic rents from resources and other profitable business activity.The company tax falls on people

It is also a backstop to personal income tax.

But the company tax is borne by real people and economic modelling by Treasury suggests it may be increasingly borne by Australian workers and consumers, not by capital.

It’s also increasingly vulnerable to the digital global economy and international tax avoidance.

Enforcement costs are increasing. Global cooperation will help but poses many challenges.

Rather than a tax cut to 28.5% for all but the largest companies, we need an honest debate about the future of company tax.

The imputation system that produces franked dividends beloved of Australian investors has benefits but also complexities, and creates an obstacle for Australian companies investing overseas.

GST and State taxes critical for prosperity and revenue

Tax reform for the States is essential for any viable reform of the federation, another white paper currently underway.

GST and State taxes critical for prosperity and revenueThe GST, which goes entirely to the States on a controversial equalised) basis, is Australia’s only broad-based tax on consumption. But it taxes less than half our consumption and raises only 13% of revenues, while the rate is lower than many comparable countries.

A broader payroll tax – not weakened in response to business lobbying and interstate competition – would fund the public goods and services that States provide.

These reforms could deliver real gains for State economies, but they need the States to gain trust of voters – and the Commonwealth to build trust in States. Transition to better State taxes must be supported by the Commonwealth government.

As Helen Hodgson highlighted last week, no one wants to be a loser.

Tax reform can support prosperity, fairness and system resilience but it requires transition that will cause some pain.

A broad conversation that looks to the long term national benefit is needed.

Since federation, the Australian community has made broad choices about government expenditures, redistribution and taxes. Its time to do it again.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


Subscribe & don’t miss a single episode of Michael Yardney’s podcast

Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.

Need help listening to Michael Yardney’s podcast from your phone or tablet?

We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.


Prefer to subscribe via email?

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.

Michael Yardney


Michael is a director of Metropole Property Strategists who help their clients grow, protect and pass on their wealth through independent, unbiased property advice and advocacy. He's once again been voted Australia's leading property investment adviser and one of Australia's 50 most influential Thought Leaders. His opinions are regularly featured in the media. Visit

'It’s time to choose what kind of tax system we want' have 1 comment


    March 3, 2015 Hamish

    Due to franking credits, company tax is really a prepayment of personal tax (whether individually or via superannuation). Australia, New Zealand and Malta are the only countries to have such a system –

    In the USA they have a different rate of tax for dividends and capital gains i.e. its not tied to your marginal tax rate. Plus they allow a deduction for your home
    They even allow income splitting by allowing couples to file jointly. Ireland allows this too!

    So there are some interesting ideas used elsewhere which could be used to help families.


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.


Copyright © Michael Yardney’s Property Investment Update Important Information
Content Marketing by GridConcepts