Three reasons for property investors to stick with the city

Three common mistakes are made by those who promote regional properties as a superior investment to Australian capital city properties.

1 . Recency bias towards downside risk

Throughout history the greatest oversight of investors has been to assume that what has happened over recent times will continue to occur.

world city map tablet technology wired live property capital transport commute urban cbd infrastructure

Human nature dictates that we build a frame of references around our past experiences and project them into the future.

Investment history is awash with examples, from tulip mania (1637) to Black Tuesday (1929) to the tech stock bubble (2002).

While the debt binge tide continues to lift all Australian property boats, some regional properties will continue to perform.

All tides turn, however, and this is precisely why regional property is risky.

Australians are fortunate.

Fuelled by a surge in mining investment, we’ve not experienced recession since Keating’s infamous “recession we had to have” of 1991-92 following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Interest rates are receding to 50-year-lows, and we’re close to effective full employment. 


While high interest rates and high unemployment have long been perceived to be idle threats in Australia, investors who fail to heed history will eventually be caught out.

If the US economy averts its fiscal cliff and China’s GDP growth powers along then Australia’s implied yield curve will cease to be an ugly inverted asymptote and even our dovish Reserve Bank board will ratchet up the cash rate.

The demographics of affluent suburbs and regional areas are markedly different in Australia.

Cheaper, outlying households are heavily reliant on linear salary income and become prone to mortgage stress when the cost of debt capital is increased, which causes regional property prices to drop.

Prime-location households tend to have substantial equity, diverse income streams and greater capacity to ride out elevated interest rates for their duration.

2. Long-term real growth in regional properties is poor

A second error that promoters of Australian regional property make is confusing periods of high inflation or credit growth with real value growth. property market

No question, with skilful timing it’s possible to find a cheap property where prices increase over the short term.

Over the long term, however, real capital growth in regional properties is poor, which clearly accounts for why the cheap regional property of yesterday remains cheap today, and yields remain high.

A standard rental combined with lacklustre growth results in a high yield, for a yield is simply a spot percentage calculated at any given point in time.

A standard rental combined with outstanding long-term growth results in lower yields.

Be clear about this: property “growth” cannot continue to be fuelled by ever-greater mortgage debt in perpetuity.

Australia had persistent inflation throughout two decades in the 1970s and 1980s, devaluing associated mortgage debt, and spiralling credit growth in the 1990s inflated property prices.

But real growth was often negligible as those who elected to sell and re-buy property value ratio percent property bank lend money

Ultimately, sustainable growth can only be sourced from productive enterprise and value being created.

Three decades ago in Australia this simply meant ripping an ever-greater volume of minerals out of our weeping planet, with 75% of our stock market’s value being resources-based.

Today only a quarter of the market’s value is founded upon resources.

Instead, wealth is created through technological ingenuity and intellectual expertise, particularly in financial services.

Sustainable property price growth needs real wages growth and growing demand.

Speculating in remote areas, outlying cities such as Cairns or tourism-dependent regions where real wages growth is negligible carries a material risk premium.

3. The yield trap and stunted upside potential

The third mistake I see in the markets every day: mum-and-dad investors and pundits who aren’t from a financial background confusing yield and income, and thus falling into the insidious yield trap.

Yield can be a devastatingly misleading indicator as to investment performance.

The “strongest” stock yields are in exporting companies who bravely maintain dividend payments in the face of the crippling appreciation of the Aussie dollar, but with market caps that have been crucified.

Similarly, in Australian property yields are highest in regional properties, where real capital growth has been dire.

The yield trap619098-house-in-trap

Chasing yields can be very costly for investors.

In Australia in 1990 you could have invested for the long haul in ‘safe’ term deposits (around 12% yield, but a diabolical long-term performance), listed property trusts (around 10% yield; mediocre performance) or the ‘risky’ industrials index (around 6% yield, massive outperformance, both in terms of income and growth).

Yes, in property investment, yield is important, but you must be able to source sustainable long-term capital growth.

All properties might perform when times are good, but when times are bad – and recessions do recur in a cyclical economy – it pays to be holding properties for which there is the highest demand located in capital cities.

The yield trap in property

Observe what happened overseas where recession globe puzzle coins economy

UK regional property prices dropped by a quarter through the financial crisis and negative equity abounds, even years later.

How cheap is regional property in the US, Ireland or Spain today?

Quality inner suburbs of London and major capitals, however, continue to be powered to fresh heights by domestic and international capital.

I know of Aussies who bought three-bedroom flats in Mayfair and the prestigious W1 postcode in the 1980s – ostensibly “low-yield properties”.

Indeed, yields remain low today but the rental income is vast – £125,000 to £350,000.

Capital growth has been phenomenal with prices measured in millions, though few such properties change hands – why would you ever offload such a cash cow?

Sure, you can wax lyrical about rental yields in Australia’s australia country population state house property vic qld nsw tas wa nt

But frankly, who cares about spot percentage yields when you can have staggering long-term outperformance from properties with wealth-creating growth and income?

When the Australian dollar depreciates and investors from Asia re-enter our property markets, will they research obscure regional areas, or will they flock to capital cities?

In Australian real estate, continual high demand which can ride out recessionary times is vital, not the obsession with an abstract yield calculation.

As immigrants continue to flood to the capitals, investment grade residential property in land-locked city suburbs will continue to be a wonderful investment for the risk-averse over the long term.



Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.



Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.

Avatar for Property Update


is a Chartered Accountant, Chartered Secretary and has a Financial Planning Diploma. Using a long term approach to building businesses, investing in equities, & owning a portfolio he achieved financial independence at the age of 33. Visit his blog

'Three reasons for property investors to stick with the city' have 6 comments

  1. Avatar for Property Update

    December 28, 2015 @ 11:20 am George

    There is much more to this than meets the eye. I have seen nice high yields of say 6-7% in regional areas but the rent is only $150-$200pw which barely covers your outgoings, expenses and repairs. Throw in a repaint and new carpet and you go out backwards. I have always said that only NET yield counts. Not gross yield which can be very misleading. In comparing property yields to other investments such as shares and cash you must use NET yield since income from shares and cash deposits have no outgoings or expenses. Real estate agents quoting (gross) yields) should be prosecuted for providing misleading and deceptive information! When quoting any return on property an agent must quote the rent but also all the outgoings in order for the correct (net) yield to be calculated.


    • Avatar for Property Update

      December 29, 2015 @ 2:14 pm Michael Yardney

      You’re right George – even more reasons to avoid investing in regional Australia


      • Avatar for Property Update

        August 22, 2016 @ 6:54 pm Jess

        Michael, Completely understand your reasonings… BUT… cities are becoming increasingly overpriced in my opinion, Regional Australia and in particular Townsville are on the verge of greatness due to huge infrastructure spends and government stimulus. I think its unfair to categorise ‘Regional Australia’ being somewhat anything other then the capital cities. What are your thoughts on Townsville being included as a capital city in the next 5 – 10 years?


        • Avatar for Property Update

          August 22, 2016 @ 10:58 pm Michael Yardney

          Jess, sorry to disagree. While I don’t disagree that capital city property prices are high that doesn’t mean the gap will close as regional property values catch up
          At at Federation regional properties cost much the same as city properties and ever since the gap has widened. Infrastructure doesn’t push up property prices. Jobs and wages growth does. And that’s happening in the big smoke.


  2. Avatar for Property Update

    December 31, 2014 @ 7:28 am [email protected]

    Hey Pete,
    Great article. I own 4 properties ( 2 in Sydney & 2 in Brisbane) all within 2 km of the CBD. I still get a 4.5% yeild so I`m not willing to gamble on some overpriced house & land in Toowomba, as being pushed by the Spruikers. I know these Spruikers push the cheaper properties because they can claim better yeilds but a 5 minute search on the web shows the yeilds are not what they are claiming. I believe you have to follow the jobs and what I like about your articles is you let the facts do the talking. The jobs are being focused more in the CBD so why would any body consider somewhere like Cairns because a short price hike. The future trend is becoming more city focussed, so the rents will rise faster than the regionals, you will have lower vacancies and pressure on prices. Ita a no Brainer!!


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.



Michael's Daily Insights

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers.

NOTE: this daily service is a different subscription to our weekly newsletter so...