The psychology of successful negotiation – Part 2: Thinking on your feet

Are you a good negotiator?

Last week I commenced this 2 part blog on the art of negotiation heremind-puzzle-personality-trick-game-learn-view-build-lesson

Armed with your newly acquired knowledge of negotiation psychology from the first part, you have the capacity to clearly define your objectives and reach a mutually beneficial resolution for all concerned.

Now we get down to the nitty gritty, as it were, of honing these skills further.

It’s all well and good to have them in your arsenal, but you also need the ability to call on any one of your negotiation strategies at a moment’s notice.

Excellent negotiators are nothing, if not adaptable; while they approach mediations fully prepared and with an expectation as to the desired outcomes, they are also ready for anything.

Know as much as you can, but accept what you can’t

While you know about your own situation and circumstances, the other party’s goals and motivations are not something you will ever be fully privy to. 

This is a fact you have to accept and work with.

While this might seem like a game of chance, rather than skill; clever negotiators are very good at viewing a deal from many angles and potential scenarios.

They ‘scratch the surface’ to get an insight into how they might be able to help the other party achieve their ideal outcome.

This knowledge then becomes a part of their negotiation strategy.

Let’s say you want to add an inner city, one-bed apartment in need of some TLC to your portfolio.

Upon viewing the property, you notice photos of a happy, smiling couple.

The woman appears to be pregnant and they’re standing in front of a home under construction. Female Real Estate Agent Offer Home Ownership And Life Insurance To Young Couple.

You casually mention to the agent – “Looks like they’re making room for a growing family. Exciting times.”

Often open ended statements like this will illicit a response from the selling agent, who confirms your initial thoughts as to the vendor’s motivation – an impending upsize in property, with the financial pressure of juggling two mortgages as the household income is downsized.

Now you have an idea as to the vendor’s ‘pain’.

This means you can think about offering a fair, but slightly lower price with shorter settlement terms.

A nice, smooth transaction without any headaches is this couple’s win scenario.

To disclose or not to disclose

Many vendors find this to be a very tricky issue.

If you are backed into a corner for some reason and need to sell as quickly as possible, time becomes your primary motivator.

When the other party knows this, they will often make cheekier offers while dangling enticing settlement terms as a carrot. property tenant success

Some things are disclosed as a matter of course while the deal is being discussed – such as a pregnancy!

However, when it comes to relationship breakdowns, financial pressures or serious illness, the ball is firmly in your court as to how open and honest you are.

Keep in mind that negotiation is about producing a win-win outcome.

Confiding in your agent as to why you need to move on can assist them in finding a potential buyer who can be an ideal party to facilitate a deal that pleases everyone.

Of course you are legally required to disclose certain things when you sell a property.

Failing to include information regarding things like mortgages, improvements, easements, planning controls, rates and taxes, can get you in hot water and quite likely sour the entire deal.

Learn the art of compromise

In my forty years as an investor, I have made more money saying ‘No’ to deals than saying ‘Yes’.

Knowing when to walk away is critical, but you have to make sure you opt out of a negotiation for the right reasons. Agreement 2679506 1920

If you have attempted to make the deal work and the other party just won’t budge, then by all means don’t waste your time.

But if something like pride prevents you from realising the next perfect asset for your portfolio, swallow it and consider a compromise.

There’s no point missing out on a property that will generate hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of ownership, for the sake of $5,000.

A fantastic way to compromise is by building giveaway concessions into your initial proposal.

Lengthier settlement terms for instance, are something you could later compromise on, particularly if you know the vendor is after a quick, no-mess sale.

Knowing when, where, how and why you are compromising, will give you the necessary confidence to do so effectively.

This is about using your head over your heart and considering the big picture result.

Make your decisions at the ‘negotiation table’ based on dollars and sense, not a need to win ‘the battle’.

Be adaptable

Entering into negotiations with clearly defined outcomes is essential, but it’s also necessary to recognise when the best outcome is one that you may not have considered.

Always be prepared to take a flexible approach.

The vendor might propose a deal you had not yet entertained, but that could actually make good financial sense for all involved.

Again, just make sure any changes to your plans and end goal are favourable.

Coping with rejection

None of us like to be told ‘no’ outright. Three People Holding The Word No! Over Their Faces

Even if we’ve heard it a thousand times (as I have!), it doesn’t make it any easier the next time, particularly if we become emotionally invested in negotiations.

If the other party responds with an immediate rebuttal to your proposed terms, don’t give up on the entire deal in the first instance.

But don’t feel intimidated into throwing all your cards on the table and making your absolute best offer at that point either – unless of course, you’re prepared to walk away.

In property, no doesn’t always mean no.

In fact it rarely ever means no.

If it does however, and you can tell there is no more room to move in order to make this deal work for you, take it as a sign that it wasn’t meant to be.

I can guarantee that another deal is waiting to be done, just around the corner.


Subscribe & don’t miss a single episode of Michael Yardney’s podcast

Hear Michael & a select panel of guest experts discuss property investment, success & money related topics. Subscribe now, whether you're on an Apple or Android handset.

Need help listening to Michael Yardney’s podcast from your phone or tablet?

We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether you're on iPhone / iPad or an Android device.


Prefer to subscribe via email?

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers and get into the head of Australia's best property investment advisor and a wide team of leading property researchers and commentators.

Bryce Yardney


Bryce is a property development specialist, having successfully sourced, project managed and completed hundreds of development projects for Metropole’s clients, helping them create substantial wealth.Visit

'The psychology of successful negotiation – Part 2: Thinking on your feet' have 4 comments


    July 18, 2014 Tom Sugar

    And may I ask why Michael Yardney didn’t notice the inconsistency in this story from Hamish?
    Auctions are where the winning bidder has to pay deposit and complete the purchase; no cooling off period, no finance clause, no pest inspection clause etc.



    July 18, 2014 Tom Sugar

    An auction is supposed to be a legally binding contract. Why was the vendor letting the winning bidder cancel the contract?

    Did the vendor get a 10% deposit from the supposed winner? If so, it seems the real estate agent played you really well. You should of offered 10% under supposed winning bid and refused to budge.

    The other possibility is the winning “bidder” was really a dummy bidder. Again, it looks like you were played by the real estate agent – you should have stuck to your $15,000 discounted price.



    July 17, 2014 Hamish

    When we bought our house at auction we were the third highest bidder….

    It was sold, for a few grand more, to someone who appeared to be a developer (later confirmed to us to be the case). We were called back an hour later as the highest bidder wanted 120 day settlement and this was unacceptable to the vendors. The agent thought we were the second highest bidder – they said “increase your bid by $500, offer 90 days or less and its yours”.

    I offered 30 day settlement – and 15 grand less. When it was rejected, I walked – and they chased.
    I ended up resubmitting my final bid, a few thousand less than the highest bid, on 30 days.


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.


Copyright © Michael Yardney’s Property Investment Update Important Information
Content Marketing by GridConcepts