Swimming against the tide… – Pete Wargent

Surfing safari

Back in the 1990s, along with two Aussie cricketing pals I set off on a surfing trip, driving up the east coast from our eastern suburbs base in Sydney to the sunny climes of Queensland.

Being excitable youths glad to have finished an arduous season of grade cricket, we drank a lot of beer and embarked upon three weeks of Olympic-standard larking around, which, of course, was exactly what we’d had in mind all along.

Amazingly enough, in between all the hooning and the high-jinx, we did actually find some time to surf. My two buddies, one of whom was (and is) a surf coach, hailed from Bondi and Bronte respectively, so it all came easily enough to them.

Having grown up myself in a freezing cold climate and possibly the most centrally-located city in England, surfing was not one of my strongest suits, and I struggled gamely, much to the amusement of my unsympathetic young colleagues.

[sam id=35 codes=’true’] As we reached the most northerly point of our trip at Noosa, we ventured out to tackle some horrible-looking surf. Predictably enough, I was completely wiped out and flailed desperately in my bid to get back to shore (cue more amusement from my Antipodean friends).

I later learned the golden rule that all Aussies are taught from birth: don’t panic and try to swim directly to shore against a rip current. Instead, swim parallel to the shore until outside the rip. Then return calmly to the safety of the beach.

 

The stock market tides

Why does Warren Buffett look to buy shares in quality companies and hold them for as long as possible? Simply, because, over time quality companies can generate larger profits, pay larger dividends and increase their valuations.

Stock markets are often perceived to be risky, but risk is related to the specific investments which you choose and the time horizon which you elect to hold them for.

While acknowledging the effect survivorship bias can have upon index data, below is copied a chart of the Dow Jones index (DJIA) from 1900 to July 2013. There were ebbs and flows…and even some famous 50 year storms!

But the crashes often followed periods of irrational exuberance and tend to look less dramatic as they fade into the rear-view mirror.

Source: stockcharts.com

The long-term trend is clear: upwards. It’s possible to make money with skilful market timing by shorting the market, but on average, the market spends more time moving upwards than it does falling, and the longer-term investor will immediately benefit from a significant head start through receiving a regular and growing dividend stream.

Those who sit out of investing in the stock market for long periods are swimming against the current.

 

The property vortex

In Australia, it is generally cheaper to rent property than it is to buy, so those who elect to sit out of the market instead of buying are not swimming against a tide of dividends.

Although renters may not be paying off a mortgage, at least their monthly cash outflows should be lower than those who have recently purchased an equivalent property (although recent interest rate cuts have delivered a welcome affordability dividend to mortgaged owners on variable rather than fixed rates).

Renters, therefore, are only swimming against the ebb of the market if nominal property prices are increasing, in regions where they are being eased higher by demand from homeowners and investors outstripping supply.

Investors too, generally experience cash outflows in the early days of property ownership in Australia, so they only move ahead if prices are increasing.

The tides which can push prices higher in a region include: a booming population and therefore a demand which the supply of dwellings is not meeting, a real and sustained increase in household incomes (in particular, where significant jobs growth is being experienced) and an in-flux of speculative investment capital.

Where these factors are not in evidence, renters may gently swim across any real or perceived rip, and drift gently back to shore: there is no tide for them to swim against.

 

City cycles

Property market cycles do not move in lockstep in Australia; some cities experience rising prices while in others they are falling. Certain experts have been saying for around half a decade now that prices in Adelaide will boom.

When I started writing my first book back in 2010, I detailed the reasons why I disagreed (and still do) with this viewpoint.

Although Adelaide has a gentle drift of population growth, the absolute numbers are relatively small, there is plenty of scope for new development, a number of planned mining projects or extensions have been shelved, and I see no reason why the city cannot house its growing population relatively affordably.

Renters don’t appear to be caught in a rip, because in real terms prices have been becoming more affordable – they are gently drifting back to within reach of some previously excluded younger buyers.

 

Sydney to outperform

While some cities will continue to see easing prices, Sydney looks set to outperform.

Although the latest round of unemployment figures from the ABS showed that the Australian economy added a seemingly impressive 160,400 jobs over the past 12 months, it is notable that 81,900 of those were in NSW and 31,700 were in VIC.

[sam id=35 codes=’true’]Jobs growth was weak in QLD and all but non-existent in SA and TAS. These figures help to explain why Sydney and Melbourne have thriving property markets while Adelaide has failed to deliver the long-promised price growth in spite of the lowest interest rates in a generation.

Sydney is a different kettle of fish entirely from Adelaide. Those waiting on the sidelines for a price crash in the harbour city aren’t swimming against a gentle undercurrent of population growth, they are facing a full-blown demographic tsunami.

Estimated annual population growth may be a touch volatile but the population growing from around 4.1 million at the time of the 2001 Census to above 4.6 million by the time of the 2011 equivalent headcount, suggests a very strong longer-term average of around 50,000 persons per annum.

A higher population does not automatically equate to higher dwelling prices, but last time I was in my apartment on Pitt Street, I took a long, hard look at the vast semi-circular area of Sydney visible from the balcony, and as far as I could tell there were only 3 ongoing residential developments of any stature.

In truth, there are a few projects coming online such as the expensive-looking new apartments on previously unfashionable Broadway, and indeed a new suburb is being constructed at Barangaroo (not that the $2 million+ price tag for the 100 two bedroom apartments is going to solve any affordability issues).

The problem is that few seem to want to venture out to the fringe suburbs, creating high land prices and affordability pressures in suburbs close to the city.

A material fall in prices might or might not be triggered at any given point in time, but with each passing year in the decade since a crash was being called after the turn of the century, the competition for prime-location real estate has been increasing, as wave after wave of immigration hits the city.

The other tide that renters are swimming against is the raging torrent of speculative capital which is flowing into Sydney. Prices do not seem to have faded in Melbourne as had been widely predicted in part because investors have returned to the market in droves, lured in by lower interest rates.

Plenty of commentators have also been forecasting price falls in Sydney for years, but these predictions were drowned by the appetite of investors for Sydney real estate.

According to the ABS, loans for investment purposes with investor lending in NSW increased by nearly 24% on a year ago and NSW made up some 40% of the value of all investor loans approved in Australia in the month of May.

Investors presently account for more than 50% of total home loan activity in the state. With record levels of investor capital washing over the established housing stock and auction clearance rates consistently topping a boomtime 80%, dwelling prices have reached a new high tide level, and increases look likely to continue to be reported over coming months.

………………………………………………………………………………………….

If you’re serious about property investment please join me and a group of property and tax experts at my upcoming Property Market and Economic Updates  that I’ll be conducting in 4 states in August and September 2013

I will be presenting a heap of BRAND NEW content I haven’t discussed in public before. I guarantee there will be several things I reveal that you are not doing and you should be!

Click here now to get more details and reserve your seat.

Property & Econonomic Update

If you want to cut through all of the media hype, and all the contradictory predictions, and finally learn the truth (good and bad) about what is going to happen to the Australian property markets, this seminar is exactly for you…  Click here now to get more details and reserve your seat.

Michael Yardney

……………………………………………………………………………….

[post_ender]



Want more of this type of information?


Pete Wargent

About

Pete Wargent is a Chartered Accountant, Chartered Secretary and has a Financial Planning Diploma. He’s achieved financial freedom at the age of 33 - as detailed in his book ‘Get a Financial Grip – A Simple Plan for Financial Freedom’. Pete now manages his investment portfolio, travels and works as a consultant in the finance industry from time to time. Visit his blog


'Swimming against the tide… – Pete Wargent' have 2 comments

  1. August 25, 2013 @ 9:29 am Gerben

    Peter, love your book and love your articles and aspire your achievement of having gained financial freedom; I am hopefully 5 years away to reach the same, depending market forces.

    Looking at the Dow chart: steady 20 year increase between ’42 and ’62 due to reconstruction after WWII; then a volatile 20 year plateau between ’62 and ’82, followed by another nearly 20 year rise untill 2001, due to loosening credit, followed yet again by a volatile plateau continuing untill today. If history is any guide, then we have a few more years of volatility, possibly due to the ending of ultra cheap money, after which we will enter another 2 decades of steady growth, possibly due to the rise of whole new industries. I will patiently await the coming temporary stock market downturn and then will pour a large sum of my real estate profits (expected to materialize in 5 years) into an index fund.

    Your thoughts?

    Your thoughts?

    Reply

  2. Pete Wargent

    August 26, 2013 @ 8:22 pm Pete Wargent

    Hi Gerben, glad you enjoyed the book.

    I suspect you’re right and that interest rates won’t stay at rock bottom the US forever. It’s usually good to have a decent level of diversification which is an attraction of index funds. As for the immediate future of the stock market, your guess is as good as mine!

    Reply


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.
CAPTCHA Image

*

0
0

Michael's Daily Insights

Join Michael Yardney's inner circle of daily subscribers.

NOTE: this daily service is a different subscription to our weekly newsletter so...

REGISTER NOW

Subscribe!